An explanation of the theory of virtue ethics by aristotle

According to Aristotle, things of any variety have a characteristic function that they are properly used to perform. His answer was that deliberate and free choice, which used his famous Golden Mean, achieves the virtue of the soul Aristotle: Just as property is ill cared for when it is owned by all, and just as a child would be poorly nurtured were he to receive no special parental care—points Aristotle makes in Politics II.

Indeed, such a virtuous life would in itself constitute eudaimonia, which should be seen as an objective, not a subjective, state, characterized by the well-lived life, irrespective of the emotional state of the person experiencing it.

Aristotelian ethics

Taking pleasure in an activity does help us improve at it, but enjoyment does not cease when perfection is achieved—on the contrary, that is when pleasure is at its peak. Much as individuals engage in behavior that they recognize as evidence of a character flaw, societies often live reluctantly or otherwise with their own imperfections.

In this section we consider eight objections, namely, the a application, b adequacy, c relativism, d conflict, e self-effacement, f justification, g egoism, and h situationist problems.

Virtue ethics

But does he know or even believe that he should refrain? A misunderstanding of eudaimonia as an unmoralized concept leads some critics to suppose that the neo-Aristotelians are attempting to ground their claims in a scientific account of human nature and what counts, for a human being, as flourishing.

Plato argues that justice should be placed in this category, but since it is generally agreed that it is desirable for its consequences, he devotes most of his time to establishing his more controversial point—that justice is to be sought for its own sake.

First, as noted earlier, we believe that cross-cultural ethical challenges, including the reduction or control of corruption, require multiple approaches and strategies. Aristotle makes this point in several An explanation of the theory of virtue ethics by aristotle his works see for example De Anima a23—b7and in Ethics X.

Virtue Ethics or Virtue Theory is an approach to Ethics that emphasizes an individual's character as the key element of ethical thinking, rather than rules about the acts themselves Deontology or their consequences Consequentialism. Aristotle is not recommending that his readers make this intellectual virtue part of their ultimate aim.

His intention in Book I of the Ethics is to indicate in a general way why the virtues are important; why particular virtues—courage, justice, and the like—are components of happiness is something we should be able to better understand only at a later point.

Since the good is never wholly realized, a friendship of this sort should, in principle, last forever. In the final section, we recommend how we can improve ethics in organizations.

Are these present in Book VI only in order to provide a contrast with practical wisdom, or is Aristotle saying that these too must be components of our goal?

In others, it designates an action that is commendable even if not the best possible. A Pluralistic View, Oxford: He says that pleasure completes the activity that it accompanies, but then adds, mysteriously, that it completes the activity in the manner of an end that is added on.

Virtue Ethics, however, embraces moral luck, arguing that the vulnerability of virtues is an essential feature of the human condition, which makes the attainment of the good life all the more valuable.

The authenticity of the Magna Moralia has been doubted, [3] whereas almost no modern scholar doubts that Aristotle wrote the Nicomachean Ethics and the Eudemian Ethics himself, even if an editor also played some part in giving us those texts in their current forms.

The explanation of akrasia is a topic to which we will return in section 7.

Virtue Ethics

We discuss the first two in the remainder of this section. Intellectual virtues are in turn divided into two sorts: But the exact role of the function argument in Aristotle's ethical theory is itself a matter of dispute. Aristotle says that unless we answer that question, we will be none the wiser—just as a student of medicine will have failed to master his subject if he can only say that the right medicines to administer are the ones that are prescribed by medical expertise, but has no standard other than this b18— Contemplating such goodness with regularity makes room for new habits of thought that focus more readily and more honestly on things other than the self.

A life cannot be very fulfilling if everyone who performs his or her duty very rarely actually wants to. Fragments also survive from Aristotle's Protrepticusanother work which dealt with ethics.

The apparent proliferation of virtues can be significantly reduced if we group virtues together with some being cardinal and others subordinate extensions of those cardinal virtues. Her definitions of duties, good and bad ends, and good and bad states of affairs are similarly grounded in the motivational and dispositional states of exemplary agents, This is not the only way of reading the Ethics, however.

Proponents counter that virtues in themselves are concerned with how we respond to the needs of others, and that the good of the agent and the good of others are not two separate aims, but both result from the exercise of virtue. Thus, we maintain that maximum inclusiveness or universality in the context of our unified ethics is the key element in any anti-corruption effort.

Virtue Ethics and its Potential as the Leading Moral Theory

He is careful to add, however, that the mean is to be determined in a way that takes into account the particular circumstances of the individual a36—b7. Aristotle did not believe that God provided us with such a life but rather we had to earn it as a result of our good actions.

One could say that he deliberates, if deliberation were something that post-dated rather than preceded action; but the thought process he goes through after he acts comes too late to save him from error. Mirrors of Virtue, New York: A logical argument could have false premises and a true conclusion, but true premises would always lead to a true conclusion.

Although there is no possibility of writing a book of rules, however long, that will serve as a complete guide to wise decision-making, it would be a mistake to attribute to Aristotle the opposite position, namely that every purported rule admits of exceptions, so that even a small rule-book that applies to a limited number of situations is an impossibility.

His point, rather, may be that in ethics, as in any other study, we cannot make progress towards understanding why things are as they are unless we begin with certain assumptions about what is the case.Aristotle's ethics is a common sense ethics built on naturalism and self-realization.

Aristotle's Ethics

Of all the classical theories considered here, his is the farthest from an ethics of self-interest. Abstract. There has been a modern revival of interest in virtue ethics as a plausible moral theory.

There has been dissatisfaction with the way many modern moral theories emphasize moral obligation and law at the expense, some argue, of the individual (Slote,p. ). The Nicomachean Ethics is one of Aristotle’s most widely read and influential works. Ideas central to ethics—that happiness is the end of human endeavor, that moral virtue is formed through action and habituation, and that good action requires prudence—found their most powerful proponent in the person medieval scholars simply called “the Philosopher.”.

The ethics of Socrates is briefly outlined. Philosophy Ethics The Ethics of Socrates. Abstract: The ethics of Socrates is briefly outlined.

Aristotle's Ethics

Aristotle defines the supreme good as an activity of the rational soul in accordance with virtue. Virtue for the Greeks is equivalent to excellence. A man has virtue as a flautist, for instance, if he plays the flute well, since playing the flute is the distinctive activity of a flautist.

Because ethics is a practical rather than a theoretical science, Aristotle also gave careful consideration to the aspects of human nature involved in acting and accepting moral evaluation of an action presupposes the attribution of responsibility to a human agent.

But in certain circumstances, this attribution would not be appropriate.

An explanation of the theory of virtue ethics by aristotle
Rated 5/5 based on 20 review